On 7 Apr 2016, at 12:17, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem is full of FUD about how ICANN could be pissed off by a decision of the IETF to add .something to the Special-Use registry, but did we actually *asked* ICANN about it?
This statement seems like FUD to me. Can you point to which paragraphs in the document that gives you that feeling? I ask this because, as much as I dislike some of the words and organization of the draft, I cannot map what you say to anything in the draft (so that I could suggest an edit).
--Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
