On 4/7/16 2:31 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On 7 Apr 2016, at 12:17, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > >> draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem is full of FUD about how >> ICANN could be pissed off by a decision of the IETF to add .something >> to the Special-Use registry, but did we actually *asked* ICANN about >> it?
https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16659.html > This statement seems like FUD to me. Can you point to which paragraphs > in the document that gives you that feeling? I ask this because, as much > as I dislike some of the words and organization of the draft, I cannot > map what you say to anything in the draft (so that I could suggest an > edit). > > --Paul Hoffman > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
