(cc:s trimmed) On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:16:02PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote: > it's a Lex Facebook, just like reserving ".local" was a Lex Apple. I'm not > generally against those at all, but I personally dislike that IETF > passes things > quickly if they are backed by multi-billion dollar companies, while putting > up high hurdles (and delays are obstacles) for proposals that are just > as sound but do not come with such support. Corporatocracy at its best.
I really have to object to this absurd claim. RFC 6762 came out in 2013. The -00 of the draft that became 6762 has a date on it of 2001. It's hard to see 12 years as "quickly". > Now, if Alec thinks there is anything in his draft that is not covered in > our original draft, That's not the problem with your original draft. The problem with your original draft is, as I've pointed out more than once, that it treats a bunch of rather different cases as though they're the same. They're different in detail, and therefore they ought to be split up and processed independently. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
