On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, hellekin wrote:
Is this meant to replace or augment
draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names ?
*** This draft only covers .onion, one of the two pTLDs related to the
Tor Project in the P2PNames draft, so the obvious answer is that it
won't replace it. Now the P2PNames draft certainly can benefit from
this discussion and will be amended accordingly.
It seems odd that two documents would be requesting an IANA action for
".onion" ?
I understand the scope of this draft is to facilitate the adoption of
.onion in the context of resolving the actual need of proper issuance of
SSL certificates for .onion domains.
Than perhaps I completely misunderstood things? How does this relate to
DNS or DNSOP if it is about issuing SSL certificates only?
Paul
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
