Hellekin, > On Mar 17, 2015, at 9:09 AM, hellekin <helle...@gnu.org> wrote: >> My personal observation is that one of the problems with your draft > *** Maybe you should direct comments on the P2PNames draft to the > P2PNames conversation. Your comment suggests that the Introduction > section of the draft did not convince you, yet you didn't say anything > about it, which demonstrates the lack of interest in moving it forward.
Actually, I did comment on draft-grothoff. Several times. In fact, in response to you back in January (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13054.html), I said: "... Overall: As with previous versions of this draft, I believe it should be broken up into separate drafts for each of the proposed 6761 special names registry entries. ..." Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
