On 5/18/14, 1:58 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
On 17 maj 2014, at 13:51, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote:
It might be worth actively pushing the CDN folks to go the SRV direction.
Even if ENAME were a good idea, which is not clear to me, it's an idea that
would require significant infrastructure changes, whereas SRV records appear to
be functional now, with no DNS software changes.
As I have stated several times I disagree with any statement that claim "significant
infrastructure changes".
This usage is the reason I did define the URI resource record, so that one could get a
"redirect" already in DNS instead of escaping to HTTP.
example.com. IN URI 1 2 "https://foo.hosting.bar/example.com/startpage/en";
Patrik
As much as I would love for the HTTP2.0 folks to adopt SRV records, but
Ted's comments on client adoption is still "wait and see".
I am finding ENAME a more palatable alternative.
tim
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
