On 17 May 2014, at 7:51, Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote: > On May 17, 2014, at 3:12 AM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >>> Or are there other uses for ENAME beyond what the HTTP/CDN crowd do >>> with CNAMEs today? >> >> I would encourage both. ENAME is just service agnostic. > > It might be worth actively pushing the CDN folks to go the SRV direction.
It seems to me that the CDN people have a solution that works for them right now. With respect to using SRV for HTTP (which I agree would be great) the gap is on the client side. It's an application issue, and I don't see a lot of work to be done in this working group. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
