In message <20140517011926.71263.qm...@f5-external.bushwire.net>, "Mark Delany"
writes:
> On 17May14, Mark Andrews allegedly wrote:
> >
> > domain ENAME domain {0|1} [type list of included / excluded types]
> > (0 == include, 1 == exclude)
>
> As I recall, the HTTP/2.0 folks have been intermittently talking about
> supporting SRV. Would encouraging that group on that front be easier
> than inventing CNAME support at the apex?
>
> No reason to think either approach would get better or less
> adoption-rates over time.
>
> Or are there other uses for ENAME beyond what the HTTP/CDN crowd do
> with CNAMEs today?
I would encourage both. ENAME is just service agnostic.
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
