On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > I think Joe's pragmatic approach is the right one: document right now > that whatever the restrictions might historically have been, we are > quite explicitly going to permit at the very least one class of > labels.
Yes, but I think that the document should make it abundantly clear that this restriction arises from the TLD allocation policy (NOT the protocol) and this policy is subject to change, as in the introduction of long TLDs and IDNS TLDs. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
