On 26 Nov 2010, at 21:35, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: > Generally I like this, and it is a much more thorough treatment than what I > was working on.
Glad you like it. > I think it needs a little wordsmithing, Definitely. It's just a quick hack to get across the protocol/policy distinction and isn't supposed to be at all polished. > and I'm not clear if Tony's intention in the last section is to indicate that > there should be a protocol restriction on non-IDN labels (which obviously I > oppose). No, that part is supposed to describe current allocation policy. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
