On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Joe Abley wrote: > > I think some of your observations (those that relate to root KSK > management in general, as described in the DPS) would have been good to > hear before July, during the design process.
Yes :-/ I was still only starting to get to grips with key management back then. > I think also that there is some sense that the trust-anchor document is > intended as a starting point for a working group design exercise, which > is not the case. This is an informational document describing an > existing service, and is being published in the interests of having a > stable specification in a sensible place for vendors to code against. Understood. One thing that is missing is any description of the kind of load you expect the service to bear. Would it be OK if a vendor sold millions of DSL modems that hit data.iana.org every time they recovered from a power loss? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7, DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 LATER IN HUMBER AND THAMES. MODERATE OR ROUGH. RAIN THEN FAIR. GOOD. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
