On 4 okt 2010, at 17.18, Tony Finch wrote: > This argument also implies that RFC 5011 cannot be used to roll over root > trust anchors in the event of a compromise.
Depending on the type of compromise, a RFC 5011 may not be appropriate. > It isn't immediately clear to me from the root KSK DPS whether you expect > RFC 5011 to work in the event of a compromise. It says: > > As part of the KSK emergency roll-over procedures, ICANN maintains > the capability of being able to generate and publish an interim Trust > Anchor within 48 hours. In favorable circumstances, this interim > Trust Anchor may be used to facilitate an orderly RFC 5011 [RFC5011] > automatic KSK roll-over to a new and sanctioned Trust Anchor > generated at a new scheduled key ceremony held with reasonable time > notice. > > Does that mean you'll use 5011 to roll from the interim TA to the > sanctioned TA, but that validator operators will have to manually install > the interim TA? Correct. jakob _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop