On 2010-10-04, at 11:24, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: >>> So, rather than designing a bunch of kludgy workarounds, it would be better >>> to ask >>> what the right thing to do is, even if that requires changing some >>> preexisting >>> document. >> >> Workarounds to what? >> >> I have not heard a clear description of a problem yet, just a lot of >> possible solutions. > > And yet, you were part of a team that spent hundreds of thousands of > dollars > and several man-years working on a solution to a, as you state above, > to a > problem without a clear statement?
The solutions I'm talking about are those recently described involving the chain of trust from old keys through successive keys. The problems that those specific solutions are intended to solve have not been described. As you know. > I'd susggest that there might be better ways to do key management and > that EKR > might have some good ideas on the subject. But thats _future_ work. Thank you. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
