On 2010-10-04, at 11:11, Eric Rescorla wrote: > Carefully specified, perhaps, but what you're saying here also makes me think > it was > also incorrectly specified, since, as I said, the technique I described is > well-known, > and failing to do so leads to precisely the complications that are at issue > here.
Regardless of what you think of it, what we have is what we have. Specifying a trust anchor publication strategy that works with something different seems a little pointless. > So, rather than designing a bunch of kludgy workarounds, it would be better > to ask > what the right thing to do is, even if that requires changing some preexisting > document. Workarounds to what? I have not heard a clear description of a problem yet, just a lot of possible solutions. Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
