Wilfried Woeber writes: > Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> Let's have RIPE.INT > removed. > > > tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. [...] > > Please leave it alone. > > In order to achieve or conserve - what? >
Energy.
jaap
PS. The last time I looked, all contracts with (g)TLD registries
has various names reserved, among them, RIPE. So, default RIPE.$TLD
is reserved. I guess that is to stop delegations like ripe.org.
