On 11/18/14 6:38 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Let's have RIPE.INT removed.
tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int.
You don't find the fact that it's been out of scope for INT for over a
decade to be compelling? We removed ip6.int for similar reasons, and
that actually had a purpose at one point in the past.
If ICANN has concerns about the delegation, then they should raise them
formally with the RIPE NCC.
It's been raised informally a non-zero number of times in the past. Why
do you think that creating a kerfuffle over something simple is the
right way to go?
There seems to be a fairly large consensus that the domain should be
removed, and Jim has asked some intelligent operational questions about
its use that IMO should be answered.
Doug
