On 11/18/14 1:38 PM, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
* Nick Hilliard wrote:>On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote:>> Let's have RIPE.INT removed.> >tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. > >If ICANN has concerns about the delegation, then they should raise them >formally with the RIPE NCC.
I second that.
Why? What value does a formal request from ICANN have over the RIPE community simply doing the right thing with an old domain that no longer has relevance?
Doug
