Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> Let's have RIPE.INT removed. > > > tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. [...] > Please leave it alone.
In order to achieve or conserve - what? > Nick Wilfried
Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > >> Let's have RIPE.INT removed. > > > tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int. [...] > Please leave it alone.
In order to achieve or conserve - what? > Nick Wilfried