Nick Hilliard wrote:

> On 18/11/2014 11:16, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> 
>>  Let's have RIPE.INT removed.
> 
> 
> tbh, I see no reason to remove ripe.int.
[...]
> Please leave it alone.

In order to achieve or conserve - what?

> Nick

Wilfried

Reply via email to