On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:17:03PM +0100, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > On 18.11.2014 16:34, Jim Reid wrote: > >On 18 Nov 2014, at 14:59, Rob Evans <r...@nosc.ja.net> wrote: > >> If they want to sit on a domain that bears a resemblance to the > >> company identity, I'll leave that up to them... > > > > That way lies madness: ripe.$TLD-of-the-week. > > > > IMO one domain name is enough. If someone can make a convincing case > > to use more than that or why ripe.whatever can achieve something not > > possible with ripe.net, please speak up. > > I know at least one TLD that serves a completely orthogonal purpose to > any "regular" TLD - and I am sure you know this one too. :-) > > I'd be almost immediately convinced if the NCC decided to register under > this particular TLD - for the services that come with it.
I have always believed that this was a kind of an experiment with short links which was introduced during and then abandoned after the RIPE61 at ROME: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2010-October/000406.html https://twitter.com/RIPE_NCC/status/28388254627 Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: piotr.strzyzew...@polsl.pl
