On Sun, Sep 7, 2014, Benjamin Scherrey <[email protected]> wrote: >Number 84 sounds fine. #86 is just looking for trouble. You were wise in 84 >to keep it positive and not enumerate a list of "banned" behaviour. To have >86 be anything beyond providing a weapon to be used by anyone looking to be >"victimized" in order to silence those whom they disagree with, you would >have to absolutely list the behaviours you don't want to tolerate. Frankly >84 is about toleration and acceptance whereas 86 can do nothing but >increase intolerance ultimately.
The only change of substance in <https://github.com/django/djangoproject.com/pull/86> is the addition of one sentence: In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may affect a person's ability to participate within them. which is the case already - this just makes it explicit. "May affect" give us plenty of scope for a measured and proportionate response - it may just mean we watch them more carefully. Daniele -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/20140907142424.1464951136%40mail.wservices.ch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
