On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 04:32:54PM +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> 
> > Updated diff:
> ....
> > Zbyszek
> 
> I have a preference for seeing packages follow
> the current packaging guidelines (that I can find)
> that say:
> 
>   Create a <package-name>.sysusers file with the user definition and
> add it to the specfile as a source.
> 
> The current diff mostly just inlines the creation of
> a sysusers file, which (while there are always
> special cases) does not seem to follow the
> guidelines.  If we are going to make a mass
> change, should we not try to follow the
> guidelines?  Or are the guidelines going to
> be changed to recommend not using
> separate <package-name>.sysusers files?

The latter: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1436.

The reason for the separate source file was to make the %sysusers_create_compat
macro work. The new solution in rpm is _much_ nicer and works just
fine with either a separate source file or creation in %prep and also
a file in the upstream tarball. In my patches, I used the inline creation
because the definitions often used macros. In the long term, maintainers
could just push those files upstream and we can drop our creation again.

Zbyszek
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to