On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 03:12:32PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 08:51:16PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > In accordance with > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Mass_package_changes/, > > I plan to do a "mass package change" to add sysusers.d config files for all > > packages > > which currently call 'useradd' and 'groupadd' and drop the calls to > > getent/id/useradd/groupadd/usermod/gpasswd. > > > > This is part of > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers. > > Latest build of rpm will autocreate users and groups for all packages that > > contain a sysusers.d config file. This means that, for those packages, we > > can drop > > the scriptlets that do that. In fact, rpm will do this unconditionally, so > > the > > scriptlets which are executed later are now noops and having them in the > > spec file > > is unnecessary and confusing. > > This indicates the required support in RPM is present for version 4.20, > which is the version already available in Fedora 41, and looking at > old F41 builds I'm seeing the virtual provides already being added > > eg > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/libvirt/10.6.0/6.fc41/data/logs/x86_64/build.log > > Provides: config(libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu) = 10.6.0-6.fc41 group(kvm) = > ZyBrdm0gMzYA group(qemu) group(qemu) = ZyBxZW11IDEwNwAA groupmember(qemu/kvm) > = bSBxZW11IGt2bQAA libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu = 10.6.0-6.fc41 > libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu(x86-64) = 10.6.0-6.fc41 > libvirt_driver_qemu.so()(64bit) user(qemu) = > dSBxZW11IDEwNzpxZW11ICJxZW11IHVzZXIiIC0gLQAA > > does this mean that the %post scripts for useradd were already obsolete > in Fedora 41, or was there some aspect that was NOT enabled, despite > the virtual Provides being added ?
The actual creation of the accounts was not enabled in F41. The commit to enable that only went in about a week ago in rawhide: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpm/c/8649a762c59ef03fab557cae6c1de9579d84e73f. (And it _is_ somewhat experimental. We're targeting F42 for the availibility of the mechanisms, but F43 for the actual switch of all packages.) > ie would it be wrong to drop %post scripts in F41 branches too ? Yes, that cannot be done. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
