Thank you for all the feedback on this proposal. Log collation support will stay in 7.0.0.
-Bryan > On Aug 23, 2016, at 2:31 PM, THOTA, REKHA <rt1...@att.com> wrote: > >>>>> Sounds like there’s some significant interest to keep this feature. I >>>>> would like to emphasize that if we keep this, we expect people to >>>>> maintain the code, fix bugs and add missing features (such as a way to >>>>> handle the orphaned logs in some reasonable way). > > Agreed! > > Thanks > Rekha > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 3:27 PM > To: <dev@trafficserver.apache.org> <dev@trafficserver.apache.org> > Cc: us...@trafficserver.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 > > >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 1:21 PM, THOTA, REKHA <rt1...@att.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> We started using log collation feature and it seems to be working well for >> us. Peter Chou from our team has recently submitted an issue in this area >> and has been actively working on the fix >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-4475. >> We want to continue using it and support it as needed. Can we please keep >> this feature? > > Sounds like there’s some significant interest to keep this feature. I would > like to emphasize that if we keep this, we expect people to maintain the > code, fix bugs and add missing features (such as a way to handle the orphaned > logs in some reasonable way). > > I’m encouraged to hear that there is interest in the feature, and good hope > that we will see continued development efforts in this area. > > Cheers, > > — leif > >> >> Thanks >> Rekha >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: James Peach [mailto:jpe...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:56 PM >> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org >> Cc: us...@trafficserver.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 >> >> >>> On Aug 23, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, people in the community are allowed to vote on keeping features. >> >> Encouraged :) >> >>> Details: >>> According to the Apache voting process there are binding and non-binding >>> votes. The binding votes are from PMC members and are the ones that count >>> officially. However, not officially, votes from the community hold a lot >>> of weight. >>> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >>> >>> -Bryan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Shrihari Kalkar >>>> <shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Okay, I would like to vote for keeping this feature if I am allowed >>>> to :) >>>> -0 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Shrihari >>>> On 8/22/16, 2:35 PM, "Bryan Call" <bc...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> There are a few bugs that are opened around log collation. >>>>> However, I don¹t think any are major issues. Your feedback is very >>>>> important in the decision on whether to keep this feature. >>>>> >>>>> Simple search on bugs with ³collation² in them: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=pr >>>>> o >>>>> ject%2 >>>>> 0%3D%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20 >>>>> % 22coll >>>>> ation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20updatedDate%20DESC >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=p >>>>> r >>>>> oject% >>>>> 20=%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22 >>>>> c ollati on%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20updatedDate%20DESC> >>>>> >>>>> -Bryan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Shrihari Kalkar >>>>>> <shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>> I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried >>>>>> using log collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to >>>>>> work reliably. It would be good to have this around. Have we seen >>>>>> many bugs in this area of code? Is it possible to keep this feature >>>>>> around? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Shrihari >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org <mailto:sor...@apache.org>> >>>>>> Reply-To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" >>>>>> <us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>> >>>>>> Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM >>>>>> To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" >>>>>> <us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>>, >>>>>> "dev@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>" >>>>>> <dev@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 >>>>>> >>>>>>> +0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call <bryan.c...@gmail.com >>>>>>>> <mailto:bryan.c...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS >>>>>>>>> 7.0.0 >>>>>>>> release. If you are using these features and require them, >>>>>>>> please respond to this email. We also need to have people that are >>>>>>>> willing >>>>>>>> to invest time and fix some of the bugs for these features. Your >>>>>>>> feedback is very important! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> have an external process take care of log collation. Here is >>>>>>>> the documentation for log collation: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/moni >>>>>>>> t >>>>>>>> oring/ >>>>>>>> logging/log-collation.en.html >>>>>>>> <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon >>>>>>>> i >>>>>>>> toring >>>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html> >>>>>>>> <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon >>>>>>>> i >>>>>>>> toring >>>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html >>>>>>>> <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/mon >>>>>>>> i >>>>>>>> toring >>>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The proposal is to remove the configurations options, >>>>>>>>> statistics, >>>>>>>> and code for log collation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as Leif. >>>>>>>> This helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an >>>>>>>> misbehaviors (eg. orphan file handling), but I don¹t think the >>>>>>>> maintenance burden is very high. +0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> J >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
