Thanks guys! I would like to vote +1 to keep this feature around. On 8/23/16, 9:56 AM, "James Peach" <jpe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Bryan Call <bc...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Yes, people in the community are allowed to vote on keeping features. > >Encouraged :) > >> Details: >> According to the Apache voting process there are binding and >>non-binding votes. The binding votes are from PMC members and are the >>ones that count officially. However, not officially, votes from the >>community hold a lot of weight. >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >><https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> >> >> -Bryan >> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 3:07 PM, Shrihari Kalkar >>><shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> wrote: >>> >>> Okay, I would like to vote for keeping this feature if I am allowed to >>>:) >>> -0 >>> Thanks, >>> Shrihari >>> On 8/22/16, 2:35 PM, "Bryan Call" <bc...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> There are a few bugs that are opened around log collation. However, I >>>> don¹t think any are major issues. Your feedback is very important in >>>>the >>>> decision on whether to keep this feature. >>>> >>>> Simple search on bugs with ³collation² in them: >>>> >>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=projec >>>>t%2 >>>> >>>>0%3D%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22c >>>>oll >>>> ation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20updatedDate%20DESC >>>> >>>><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=proje >>>>ct% >>>> >>>>20=%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22coll >>>>ati >>>> on%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20updatedDate%20DESC> >>>> >>>> -Bryan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Aug 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Shrihari Kalkar >>>>> <shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried using >>>>> log collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to work >>>>> reliably. It would be good to have this around. Have we seen many >>>>>bugs >>>>> in this area of code? Is it possible to keep this feature around? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Shrihari >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org <mailto:sor...@apache.org>> >>>>> Reply-To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" >>>>><us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>> >>>>> Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM >>>>> To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" >>>>><us...@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>>, >>>>>"dev@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>" <dev@trafficserver.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 >>>>> >>>>>> +0 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org >>>>>> <mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call <bryan.c...@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:bryan.c...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 >>>>>>> release. If you are using these features and require them, please >>>>>>> respond to this email. We also need to have people that are >>>>>>>willing >>>>>>> to invest time and fix some of the bugs for these features. Your >>>>>>> feedback is very important! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe and >>>>>>> have an external process take care of log collation. Here is the >>>>>>> documentation for log collation: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitori >>>>>>>ng/ >>>>>>> logging/log-collation.en.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitor >>>>>>>ing >>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html> >>>>>>> >>>>>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitor >>>>>>>ing >>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitor >>>>>>>ing >>>>>>> /logging/log-collation.en.html>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The proposal is to remove the configurations options, statistics, >>>>>>> and code for log collation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as >>>>>>>Leif. >>>>>>> This helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an >>>>>>> misbehaviors (eg. orphan file handling), but I don¹t think the >>>>>>> maintenance burden is very high. +0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> J >>>> >>> >> >
