There are a few bugs that are opened around log collation. However, I don’t think any are major issues. Your feedback is very important in the decision on whether to keep this feature.
Simple search on bugs with “collation” in them: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=project%20%3D%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22collation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20updatedDate%20DESC <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=project%20=%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22collation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20updatedDate%20DESC> -Bryan > On Aug 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Shrihari Kalkar <shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> > wrote: > > Hey guys, > I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried using log > collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to work reliably. It > would be good to have this around. Have we seen many bugs in this area of > code? Is it possible to keep this feature around? > Thanks, > Shrihari > > > From: Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org <mailto:sor...@apache.org>> > Reply-To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org > <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org > <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>> > Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM > To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" > <us...@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>>, > "dev@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>" > <dev@trafficserver.apache.org <mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>> > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 > >> +0 >> >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org >> <mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call <bryan.c...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:bryan.c...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 >>> > release. If you are using these features and require them, please >>> > respond to this email. We also need to have people that are willing to >>> > invest time and fix some of the bugs for these features. Your feedback >>> > is very important! >>> > >>> > An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe and have an >>> > external process take care of log collation. Here is the documentation >>> > for log collation: >>> > https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html >>> > >>> > <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html> >>> > >>> > <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html >>> > >>> > <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html>> >>> > >>> > The proposal is to remove the configurations options, statistics, and >>> > code for log collation. >>> >>> I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as Leif. This >>> helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an misbehaviors >>> (eg. orphan file handling), but I don’t think the maintenance burden is >>> very high. +0 >>> >>> J
