Hey guys, I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried using log collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to work reliably. It would be good to have this around. Have we seen many bugs in this area of code? Is it possible to keep this feature around? Thanks, Shrihari
From: Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org<mailto:sor...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>> Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>>, "dev@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>" <dev@trafficserver.apache.org<mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 +0 On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org<mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call > <bryan.c...@gmail.com<mailto:bryan.c...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 release. > If you are using these features and require them, please respond to this > email. We also need to have people that are willing to invest time and fix > some of the bugs for these features. Your feedback is very important! > > An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe and have an > external process take care of log collation. Here is the documentation for > log collation: > https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html > > <https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/logging/log-collation.en.html> > > The proposal is to remove the configurations options, statistics, and code > for log collation. I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as Leif. This helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an misbehaviors (eg. orphan file handling), but I don’t think the maintenance burden is very high. +0 J
