Okay, I would like to vote for keeping this feature if I am allowed to :) -0 Thanks, Shrihari On 8/22/16, 2:35 PM, "Bryan Call" <bc...@apache.org> wrote:
>There are a few bugs that are opened around log collation. However, I >don¹t think any are major issues. Your feedback is very important in the >decision on whether to keep this feature. > >Simple search on bugs with ³collation² in them: >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=project%2 >0%3D%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22coll >ation%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20updatedDate%20DESC ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-966?filter=12338253&jql=project% >20=%20TS%20AND%20resolution%20=%20Unresolved%20AND%20text%20~%20%22collati >on%22%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC,%20updatedDate%20DESC> > >-Bryan > > > > >> On Aug 22, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Shrihari Kalkar >><shrihari.kal...@riverbed.com> wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> I really like this feature and we use it quite often. We tried using >>log collation with pipes but somehow we couldn't get that to work >>reliably. It would be good to have this around. Have we seen many bugs >>in this area of code? Is it possible to keep this feature around? >> Thanks, >> Shrihari >> >> >> From: Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org <mailto:sor...@apache.org>> >> Reply-To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>> >> Date: Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:29 AM >> To: "us...@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>" <us...@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:us...@trafficserver.apache.org>>, "dev@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>" <dev@trafficserver.apache.org >><mailto:dev@trafficserver.apache.org>> >> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Removing logs collation support in 7.0.0 >> >>> +0 >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:06 PM James Peach <jpe...@apache.org >>><mailto:jpe...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Aug 19, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Bryan Call <bryan.c...@gmail.com >>>><mailto:bryan.c...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > There are a few features we are looking to remove in the ATS 7.0.0 >>>>release. If you are using these features and require them, please >>>>respond to this email. We also need to have people that are willing >>>>to invest time and fix some of the bugs for these features. Your >>>>feedback is very important! >>>> > >>>> > An alternative solution to log collation is to log to a pipe and >>>>have an external process take care of log collation. Here is the >>>>documentation for log collation: >>>> > >>>>https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring/ >>>>logging/log-collation.en.html >>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring >>>>/logging/log-collation.en.html> >>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring >>>>/logging/log-collation.en.html >>>><https://docs.trafficserver.apache.org/en/latest/admin-guide/monitoring >>>>/logging/log-collation.en.html>> >>>> > >>>> > The proposal is to remove the configurations options, statistics, >>>>and code for log collation. >>>> >>>> I thought I thoughi I already replied with similar substance as Leif. >>>>This helped a lot when we started with ATS. It does have bugs an >>>>misbehaviors (eg. orphan file handling), but I don¹t think the >>>>maintenance burden is very high. +0 >>>> >>>> J >
