Yeah I don't really know, everyone who devs on window seems to think it matters, but I haven't had any experience with it personally.
Ethan On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > What I'm trying to get at is, what are the "solution and related > projects" good for? The non-Windows world does fine without them, so > if "make" can work on Windows then why is the result "basically > useless for any practical development purpose"? > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 04:50:40PM -0500, Ethan Jackson wrote: >> My understanding is that Guru is working on a solution to this >> problem. What were your thoughts? >> >> Ethan >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 08:11:00PM +0000, Alessandro Pilotti wrote: >> >> We did some testing with autoconf / automake on Windows. Makefiles >> >> are getting generated correctly although we cannot obviously verify >> >> the result with a full build since we didn?t port all the patches to >> >> the master branch yet. >> >> >> >> There?s anyway a huge limitation: it does not generate a Visual >> >> Studio solution and related projects, which means that it?s >> >> basically useless for any practical development purpose. >> > >> > What are those files good for? >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dev mailing list >> > dev@openvswitch.org >> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
