On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:38:57PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:58:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:47:32AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:46:15PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >>>> In the meantime, I'd prefer to treat OFPAT_GROUP as an action set in > >>>> both cases, for consistency. Would you mind modifying the patch to do > >>>> that? It should simplify it, a little. > >>> > >>> Sure. Actually that was what earlier postings of this patch did. > >> > >> Thanks. In the meantime there's been some discussion in EXT-408 of > >> the intent here, and it looks like others think the same way I do, so > >> I think that executing OFPAT_GROUP as an action set is correct. > > > > Thanks, that is quite fine by me. > > Simon, sorry for the extra work my earlier comment on this ended up costing > you.
No problem at all. The spec seems to be very unclear here and to be quite honest it was not a lot of work to add support for your interpretation and then remove it again. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
