Hi Simon, Can I take HEAD and start exploring on groups. I want to try this for VXLAN and 'flow based tunneling'.
Regards, Balaji.P > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Horman [mailto:ho...@verge.net.au] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:19 AM > To: Ben Pfaff > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Neil Zhu; Jarno Rajahalme; Casey Barker; P > Balaji-B37839; Addepalli Srini-B22160 > Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] Translation of fast failover groups > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:04:25PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:17:50PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Fast failover groups use the actions in the first bucket that is > > > alive. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > > > Please make bucket_is_alive() log a rate-limited warning if it reaches > > the liveness depth limit. > > Sure, will do. > > > xlate_ff_group() abandons translation entirely, with ctx->exit, if > > there is no live bucket. I think that this reads too much into what > > the standard says, which is just "If no buckets are live, packets are > > dropped." I think the intention is just that, if there's no live > > bucket, don't send the packet to any bucket, but (as usual) the > > wording is ambiguous. > > Yes, I agree. Actually I had come to the same conclusion while reading > over the patch at around the same time that you wrote this email. > I'll remove setting ctx->exit. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev