Hi Kay,

Kay Schenk wrote:
> OK, here's a related 'boost" question. I have installed boost 1.54, but
> it's for my distro and not totally complete, so I will install the rest of
> the "config/test" items today and verify installation.
> 
> I am using --with-system-boost

Ah, I didn't know that you were using --with-system-boost and that
version being 1.54. This is an interesting detail that I hadn't seen in
your earlier mails. It could explain most of the trouble you are
experiencing. Do things work better with the internal version?

> Is it OK to use this newer version because I'm getting errors [...]

The 1.54 boost version you are using is much newer than the AOO internal
version, which is version still at 1.48. We should upgrade our codebase
to work with the newer version and update the internal boost then. This
could solve many compile warnings that are spewed out for 1.48 and fix
some hard problems like the one with the Solaris compilers.

But as you saw such support for newer boost versions is more than just a
recompile. Making AOO build with newer boost versions may be an
interesting topic for a volunteer. One could leverage the experience of
the very popular boost library to dive into many corners of the AOO
codebase.

Herbert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to