Hi Raymond,
Thanks for the information. Sorry about the PDF. Unfortunately, we are unable
to do a simple copy and paste because of the way are system is setup. The only
other option that I have is to type the output, but that would have taken much
longer.
Ok. I just wanted to make sure that its not a simple oversight.
C++ template errors are often very extensive and look quite scary. If
the problem hides in a little type difference of the n-th argument of a
multi-layer template specialization, then finding these miniscule
differences is hard enough even with regexp magic or with specialized
tools ("template error message decryptors") such as STLFilt.
Without the error message text but just images of this text it becomes
much harder to diagnose a problem.
> We just implemented the patch, but are still receiving the same
output. We are investigating now.
This cannot possibly be! The original error output was that construction
of the "insertion" object failed because of type and constness
mismatches. With the patch there is no insertion object anymore, so
there error output cannot possibly be the same!
Herbert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
