Hello,

I agree with Jacqueline here. While I believe that the theory according to which ODF, if implemented inside MS Office, would help the adoption of OOo, is tempting, it is jut not what I hear from customers, members of the administrations, and CIOs of the private sector. To them it would be, in contrary, their best excuse for *not going OOo*, actually. Remember, people hate to change. CIOs do even more :) . Office suites are a crucial part of the infrastructure they have to deal with and at the same time, it's a commodity. You can tell them whatever you want and show them the fanciest technology, at the end of the day their job is to keep the IT working, if not the entire corporate processes running from the production facilities to the accounting dept.

So I think it should be clear that, despite the respect we have of the OD fellowship's work, the interests of the two, OOo and the fellowship converge on many points but do not match exactly.

I don't see how this statement could be hostile toward one or another, by the way. But it may be good and useful to draw lines, sometimes.

Besides, I don't think that allowing MS to have access to ODF is a good thing. Let's isolate them increasingly rather than give them the stick they'll use to beat us down and the whole community.

Me, I'd rather have no ODF plugin for MS Office, unless it's an absolute customer's requirement. As I said, customers hate to change, and the more they stick with MS Office the happier they will be. When you prove them that OOo is as feature rich than MS Office, they'll tell you that macros can't be implemented in a similar way. When macros don't matter after all, they'll tell you about the format. And so at that point, I'd rather go on showing them what is possible and what brings them value with OOo and ODF. But an ODF plugin, whatever the technological interest it might create, is not wishable, for OOo, for SO, for KOffice, for Workplace and for FOSS in general.

Hope this helps,

Charles.

It is not so much inside and outside, but the fact that we are here to
promote and encourage the use of OpenOffice.org, which I would think is
just one of tools in the OpenDocument Fellowship toolbox. Another is
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060505081533186


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to