Hi,
:)) it's not too bad anyway.

To end up with this thread, I just want to say that my
suggestions come from my experience with customers. The sad
thing is that they are not always logic...

Best,
Charles.
> Hi Charles,
>
> I hope you don't mid that I mail you *off-list*. Since the
subject is a
> little controversial, I'd rather ask my things in this way.
>
> To have a look in the mirror, try to understand others point
of view, I
> would like to put it as follows, so that you can (if you
will like to)
> explain.
>
> a - Organizations hate to switch, also theire
office-application.
> b - When they switch, they expect savings (less licence-costs).
> c - So when the (sometimes) big horde of macro's is taken
(and the
> interaction between orther apps, i.e. CRM's etc.) they will
be glad when
> exchanging their docs with others, isn't a (big) problem.
> d - Thus the question is: does a good ODF plugin serve this
goal?
>
> Would you prefer, I'll put this on-list, so that you can
react there.
>
> Greetings,
> Cor
>
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I agree with Jacqueline here. While I believe that the
theory according
> > to which ODF, if implemented inside MS Office, would help
the adoption
> > of OOo, is tempting, it is jut not what I hear from
customers, members
> > of the administrations, and CIOs of the private sector. To
them it would
> > be, in contrary, their best excuse for *not going OOo*,
actually.
> > Remember, people hate to change. CIOs do even more :) .
Office suites
> > are a crucial part of the infrastructure they have to deal
with and at
> > the same time, it's a commodity. You can tell them
whatever you want and
> > show them the fanciest technology, at the end of the day
their job is to
> > keep the IT working, if not the entire corporate processes
running from
> > the production facilities to the accounting dept.
> >
> > So I think it should be clear that, despite the respect we
have of the
> > OD fellowship's work, the interests of the two, OOo and
the fellowship
> > converge on many points but do not match exactly.
> >
> > I don't see how this statement could be hostile toward one
or another,
> > by the way. But it may be good and useful to draw lines,
sometimes.
> >
> > Besides, I don't think that allowing MS to have access to
ODF is a good
> > thing. Let's isolate them increasingly rather than give
them the stick
> > they'll use to beat us down and the whole community.
> >
> > Me, I'd rather have no ODF plugin for MS Office, unless
it's an absolute
> > customer's requirement. As I said, customers hate to
change, and the
> > more they stick with MS Office the happier they will be.
When you prove
> > them that OOo is as feature rich than MS Office, they'll
tell you that
> > macros can't be implemented in a similar way. When macros
don't matter
> > after all, they'll tell you about the format. And so at
that point, I'd
> > rather go on showing them what is possible and what brings
them value
> > with OOo and ODF. But an ODF plugin, whatever the
technological interest
> > it might create, is not wishable, for OOo, for SO, for
KOffice, for
> > Workplace and for FOSS in general.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Charles.
> >
> >>
> >> It is not so much inside and outside, but the fact that
we are here to
> >> promote and encourage the use of OpenOffice.org, which I
would think is
> >> just one of tools in the OpenDocument Fellowship toolbox.
Another is
> >>
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20060505081533186

> >>
> >>
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cor Nouws
> www.bsooo.nl - www.nouenoff.nl
> Free your files
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 
3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 €/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to