+1 (non-binding) пт, 26 июн. 2026 г. в 07:57, John Zhuge <[email protected]>:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 2:20 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:58 PM Matt Topol <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, 2:52 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 11:53 AM Prashant Singh < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Prashant Singh >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:49 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:13 AM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2026/06/25 16:48:20 Ryan Blue wrote: >>>>>>> > +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:24 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > +1(binding) >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Yufei >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:13 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > >> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 AM Alexandre Dutra < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > >> wrote: >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:03 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > Posted some minor comments but overall good to have them! >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:27 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>>>>>> > >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > чт, 25 июн. 2026 г., 16:20 Manu Zhang < >>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>> > >>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>> > >> +1 (non-binding). I'm really excited about the use cases >>>>>>> it can >>>>>>> > >>> unblock. >>>>>>> > >>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>> > >> Thanks, >>>>>>> > >>> > >> Manu >>>>>>> > >>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:27 PM Szehon Ho < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition. >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> Thanks >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> Szehon >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> > >>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions >>>>>>> spec. >>>>>>> > >>> This spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of >>>>>>> expressions that >>>>>>> > >>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended >>>>>>> to clean up >>>>>>> > >>> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query >>>>>>> filters) and to >>>>>>> > >>> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in >>>>>>> metadata, >>>>>>> > >>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and >>>>>>> `CHECK` >>>>>>> > >>> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has >>>>>>> > >>> discussed this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc >>>>>>> and PR! >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>> Ryan >>>>>>> > >>> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> > > -- > John Zhuge >
