+1(binding) Yufei
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:13 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:03 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Posted some minor comments but overall good to have them! >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:27 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 (non-binding) >> > > >> > > чт, 25 июн. 2026 г., 16:20 Manu Zhang <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> > >> +1 (non-binding). I'm really excited about the use cases it can >> unblock. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Manu >> > >> >> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:27 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> +1 (binding) >> > >>> >> > >>> Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition. >> > >>> Thanks >> > >>> Szehon >> > >>> >> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) >> > >>>> >> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> +1 (binding) >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This >> spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that Iceberg >> formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up >> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and to >> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, >> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` >> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed >> this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >> > >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >> > >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Thanks, >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> Ryan >> >
