+1 (non-binding)

On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 12:10 PM Tanmay Rauth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 8:35 AM Junwang Zhao <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> It would be great if the minor comments could be addressed, but
>> they're not blocking.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2026 at 10:38 PM Aihua Xu <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 3:03 AM Christian Thiel 
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>
>> >> vaquar khan <[email protected]> schrieb am Sa. 27. Juni 2026 um 07:31:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Viquar Khan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2026 at 21:49, huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 6:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
>> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>  +1 (non binding)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>>> JB
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 12:52 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This spec 
>> >>>>>> defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that 
>> >>>>>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean 
>> >>>>>> up expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query 
>> >>>>>> filters) and to enable new use cases that require expressions to be 
>> >>>>>> stored in metadata, including expression defaults 
>> >>>>>> (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` constraints (`col < 360.0`).
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has discussed this 
>> >>>>>> in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec
>> >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . .
>> >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . .
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Ryan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Junwang Zhao

Reply via email to