+1 (binding) On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:24 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1(binding) > > Yufei > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 9:13 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:45 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:03 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>> > Posted some minor comments but overall good to have them! >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 10:27 PM Andrei Tserakhau via dev >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > +1 (non-binding) >>> > > >>> > > чт, 25 июн. 2026 г., 16:20 Manu Zhang <[email protected]>: >>> > >> >>> > >> +1 (non-binding). I'm really excited about the use cases it can >>> unblock. >>> > >> >>> > >> Thanks, >>> > >> Manu >>> > >> >>> > >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 1:27 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >>> > >>> +1 (binding) >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition. >>> > >>> Thanks >>> > >>> Szehon >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> +1 (binding) >>> > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. >>> This spec defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions that >>> Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean up >>> expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and to >>> enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, >>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` >>> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> This spec is PR #16652. Thank you to everyone that has >>> discussed this in community syncs or reviewed the design doc and PR! >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >>> > >>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >>> > >>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Thanks, >>> > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> Ryan >>> >>
