+1 (binding) Went over it, it seems a nice elegant definition. Thanks Szehon
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 9:00 PM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 7:26 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 3:52 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to start a vote to adopt the new expressions spec. This spec >>> defines the minimal structure and behavior of expressions >>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VthBz0S2I39TeQM8oiF9_gSPQu_gHAjWXvdFpv0QqDk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.54u4q3416qx8> >>> that Iceberg formats need to store and exchange. This is intended to clean >>> up expressions used in the REST catalog spec (exchanging query filters) and >>> to enable new use cases that require expressions to be stored in metadata, >>> including expression defaults (`current_timestamp()`) and `CHECK` >>> constraints (`col < 360.0`). >>> >>> This spec is PR #16652 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16652>. >>> Thank you to everyone that has discussed this in community syncs or >>> reviewed the design doc and PR! >>> >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>> >>> [ ] +1: Adopt the expressions spec >>> [ ] +0: . . . >>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec because . . . >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ryan >>> >>
