agree with Kevin to move "Blogs" and "Talks" into a new "Community" group, along with the current "Community" page. but it can be tackled in a separate PR.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 8:55 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for starting this discussion Manu! > > Big +1 to re-organizing the tabs on the main site. I agree with Russell > and think we should make an even bigger change. Happy to continue the > conversation here or we can start a new thread. > > For one, I think we can move "Blogs", "Talks", and perhaps even "Vendors" > into a new "Community" tab. The contents in "Blogs" also feel very > vendor-centric to me. Perhaps we should re-evaluate the contents and make > sure it aligns with the Community Guidelines > <https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#community-guidelines>. > > In general, the main site is where folks new and old to the project > gather. I'm happy to help drive the effort to make it easier to navigate. > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 1:01 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've left some comments on the PR, thanks for cleaning this up Manu. >> >> Manish, regarding your question. First, I think this is a separate >> discussion, but a valid one. This was also suggested in the past >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9666>, but got closed because I >> was changing diapers. I think it would be good to raise a new PR to add >> this section. Regarding V3, I think this is a constant balance between the >> scope and the timeline, and I think it would be good to track the >> milestones for that reason <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones> >> . >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op zo 16 feb 2025 om 17:27 schreef Manish Malhotra < >> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Sorry Manu, I saw the message late. >>> From some time, I was also thinking that docs needs to be realigned to >>> make navigation easier. >>> Thanks for doing the doc refactoring. >>> >>> Agreed Steven and Russel’s suggestions. >>> >>> Wanted to discuss one suggestion, >>> Shall we have a section for “future release/plans”? >>> Where we can talk about some of the important upcoming changes or >>> project with design etc. like v3, Spark 4 etc. >>> I see value in this section, as Iceberg community is so big and wide, >>> this will help. >>> >>> Manu, Russel and Steven WDYT? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Manish >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 7:00 AM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Russell and Steven, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your great suggestions. Please help review PR >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12289 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Manu >>>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 3:46 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> That sounds good to me , "Spec" Or "Specification" >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 1:41 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It makes sense to separate out the technical parts (specs) from the >>>>>> current "Project" group. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the new "technical" content (catalog, term, specs), "Concepts" is >>>>>> probably not accurate. Maybe "Spec" is more appropriate. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we should do an even bigger change. IMHO, Project should >>>>>>> have information about interacting with the project so >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Community >>>>>>> Contributing >>>>>>> Implementation Status >>>>>>> Multi-engine Support >>>>>>> How to Release >>>>>>> ASF >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then have Concepts include all the technical details >>>>>>> * Spec >>>>>>> Terms >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> nm. Found the "Terms" from the left navigation menu under >>>>>>>> "Project". Earlier, I was looking for it from the "Project" tab which >>>>>>>> shows >>>>>>>> the "Community" page. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anyway, I agree that the content of "Terms" is more aligned with >>>>>>>> the "Concept" group than "Project" group. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:15 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Manu, how to navigate to the "terms" page? I can't find the >>>>>>>>> "terms" link from the project page. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It seems reasonable to move the "Terms" content to the "Concept" >>>>>>>>> page for easier discoverability. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:43 AM Manu Zhang < >>>>>>>>> owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have objections to this change? If not, I'm going to >>>>>>>>>> open a PR. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:43 AM Manu Zhang < >>>>>>>>>> owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On the website, we have docs under Concepts with only >>>>>>>>>>> Catalogs[1] and Project/Terms[2] serving similar purposes. Do you >>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>> it's a good idea to consolidate the two pages? For example, move >>>>>>>>>>> all items >>>>>>>>>>> under Terms to Concepts for better visibility. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/ >>>>>>>>>>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. https://iceberg.apache.org/terms/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> Manu >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
