I saw the change this morning while looking for the spec, looking good :) Op wo 19 feb 2025 om 02:33 schreef Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>:
> agree with Kevin to move "Blogs" and "Talks" into a new "Community" group, > along with the current "Community" page. but it can be tackled in a > separate PR. > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 8:55 AM Kevin Liu <kevinjq...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this discussion Manu! >> >> Big +1 to re-organizing the tabs on the main site. I agree with Russell >> and think we should make an even bigger change. Happy to continue the >> conversation here or we can start a new thread. >> >> For one, I think we can move "Blogs", "Talks", and perhaps even "Vendors" >> into a new "Community" tab. The contents in "Blogs" also feel very >> vendor-centric to me. Perhaps we should re-evaluate the contents and make >> sure it aligns with the Community Guidelines >> <https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#community-guidelines>. >> >> In general, the main site is where folks new and old to the project >> gather. I'm happy to help drive the effort to make it easier to navigate. >> >> Best, >> Kevin Liu >> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 1:01 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I've left some comments on the PR, thanks for cleaning this up Manu. >>> >>> Manish, regarding your question. First, I think this is a separate >>> discussion, but a valid one. This was also suggested in the past >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9666>, but got closed because I >>> was changing diapers. I think it would be good to raise a new PR to add >>> this section. Regarding V3, I think this is a constant balance between the >>> scope and the timeline, and I think it would be good to track the >>> milestones for that reason >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones>. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Fokko >>> >>> Op zo 16 feb 2025 om 17:27 schreef Manish Malhotra < >>> manish.malhotra.w...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Sorry Manu, I saw the message late. >>>> From some time, I was also thinking that docs needs to be realigned to >>>> make navigation easier. >>>> Thanks for doing the doc refactoring. >>>> >>>> Agreed Steven and Russel’s suggestions. >>>> >>>> Wanted to discuss one suggestion, >>>> Shall we have a section for “future release/plans”? >>>> Where we can talk about some of the important upcoming changes or >>>> project with design etc. like v3, Spark 4 etc. >>>> I see value in this section, as Iceberg community is so big and wide, >>>> this will help. >>>> >>>> Manu, Russel and Steven WDYT? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Manish >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 7:00 AM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Russell and Steven, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your great suggestions. Please help review PR >>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12289 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Manu >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 3:46 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> That sounds good to me , "Spec" Or "Specification" >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 1:41 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> It makes sense to separate out the technical parts (specs) from the >>>>>>> current "Project" group. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For the new "technical" content (catalog, term, specs), "Concepts" >>>>>>> is probably not accurate. Maybe "Spec" is more appropriate. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think we should do an even bigger change. IMHO, Project should >>>>>>>> have information about interacting with the project so >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Community >>>>>>>> Contributing >>>>>>>> Implementation Status >>>>>>>> Multi-engine Support >>>>>>>> How to Release >>>>>>>> ASF >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then have Concepts include all the technical details >>>>>>>> * Spec >>>>>>>> Terms >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> nm. Found the "Terms" from the left navigation menu under >>>>>>>>> "Project". Earlier, I was looking for it from the "Project" tab which >>>>>>>>> shows >>>>>>>>> the "Community" page. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, I agree that the content of "Terms" is more aligned with >>>>>>>>> the "Concept" group than "Project" group. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:15 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Manu, how to navigate to the "terms" page? I can't find the >>>>>>>>>> "terms" link from the project page. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It seems reasonable to move the "Terms" content to the "Concept" >>>>>>>>>> page for easier discoverability. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:43 AM Manu Zhang < >>>>>>>>>> owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have objections to this change? If not, I'm going to >>>>>>>>>>> open a PR. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:43 AM Manu Zhang < >>>>>>>>>>> owenzhang1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On the website, we have docs under Concepts with only >>>>>>>>>>>> Catalogs[1] and Project/Terms[2] serving similar purposes. Do you >>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>> it's a good idea to consolidate the two pages? For example, move >>>>>>>>>>>> all items >>>>>>>>>>>> under Terms to Concepts for better visibility. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/ >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. https://iceberg.apache.org/terms/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Manu >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
