It makes sense to separate out the technical parts (specs) from the current "Project" group.
For the new "technical" content (catalog, term, specs), "Concepts" is probably not accurate. Maybe "Spec" is more appropriate. On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:41 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we should do an even bigger change. IMHO, Project should have > information about interacting with the project so > > Community > Contributing > Implementation Status > Multi-engine Support > How to Release > ASF > > Then have Concepts include all the technical details > * Spec > Terms > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:27 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> nm. Found the "Terms" from the left navigation menu under "Project". >> Earlier, I was looking for it from the "Project" tab which shows the >> "Community" page. >> >> Anyway, I agree that the content of "Terms" is more aligned with the >> "Concept" group than "Project" group. >> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:15 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Manu, how to navigate to the "terms" page? I can't find the "terms" link >>> from the project page. >>> >>> It seems reasonable to move the "Terms" content to the "Concept" page >>> for easier discoverability. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:43 AM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Does anyone have objections to this change? If not, I'm going to open a >>>> PR. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:43 AM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> On the website, we have docs under Concepts with only Catalogs[1] and >>>>> Project/Terms[2] serving similar purposes. Do you think it's a good idea >>>>> to >>>>> consolidate the two pages? For example, move all items under Terms to >>>>> Concepts for better visibility. >>>>> >>>>> 1. https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/ >>>>> <https://iceberg.apache.org/concepts/catalog/> >>>>> 2. https://iceberg.apache.org/terms/ >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Manu >>>>> >>>>
