It seems my earlier question might have been overlooked. Could we clarify if JDK 8 support is being dropped in the next version? The proposal indicated for Iceberg 2.0 release, but it's unclear if that's our next version. Given that I'm working on Spark 4.0 support <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, which only runs on Java 17 and 21, dropping JDK 8 in the next release could help us maintain consistency with Spark's Java requirements.
Thanks 🙂 On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:21 AM Ryan Blue <b...@databricks.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:49 PM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 07:15 Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Manu, >>>> >>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>>> >>>> Nothing stops people from cutting a release, and it becomes an official >>>> release once it is approved. Here is the Apache Release Policy for >>>> reference, https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html. >>>> >>>> Yufei >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing >>>>>> as Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan). >>>>>> >>>>>> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR >>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may >>>>>> have to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in >>>>>> Spark 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Szehon >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, >>>>>>> will there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix >>>>>>>> critical issues in 1.6+? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but >>>>>>>>> overall +1 for dropping JDK8 support. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Jack >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage >>>>>>>>>> everyone to spark out about any concerns. >>>>>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding >>>>>>>>>>>> JDK 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things >>>>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>>>> initially related. >>>>>>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 >>>>>>>>>>>> support, and release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK >>>>>>>>>>>> 8. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps >>>>>>>>>>>> formal vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > -- > Ryan Blue > Databricks >
