+1 (non-binding)

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0.  I also wonder the same thing as
> Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan).
>
> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may have to
> drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in Spark 4.0,
> before Iceberg 2.0.
>
> Thanks
> Szehon
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, will
>> there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical
>>> issues in 1.6+?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but overall +1
>>>> for dropping JDK8 support.
>>>>
>>>> -Jack
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage everyone
>>>>> to spark out about any concerns.
>>>>> Yufei
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen <
>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK
>>>>>>> 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were 
>>>>>>> initially
>>>>>>> related.
>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, and
>>>>>>> release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline.
>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal
>>>>>>> vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

Reply via email to