Hi Manu, If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical issues > in 1.6+? > Nothing stops people from cutting a release, and it becomes an official release once it is approved. Here is the Apache Release Policy for reference, https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html.
Yufei On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing as >> Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan). >> >> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may have >> to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in Spark >> 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, will >>> there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but >>>>> overall +1 for dropping JDK8 support. >>>>> >>>>> -Jack >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage >>>>>> everyone to spark out about any concerns. >>>>>> Yufei >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK >>>>>>>> 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were >>>>>>>> initially >>>>>>>> related. >>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, >>>>>>>> and release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal >>>>>>>> vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
