+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:54 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Manu, > > If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >> issues in 1.6+? >> > Nothing stops people from cutting a release, and it becomes an official > release once it is approved. Here is the Apache Release Policy for > reference, https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html. > > Yufei > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 7:22 PM Renjie Liu <liurenjie2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 9:40 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 for dropping JDK 8 in Iceberg 2.0. I also wonder the same thing as >>> Huaxin (sorry if I missed a previous thread on Iceberg 2.0 plan). >>> >>> Also as Huaxin has discovered in Spark 4.0 Support PR >>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10622>, looks like we may have >>> to drop Java8 first in Spark 4.0 module, due to it being dropped in Spark >>> 4.0, before Iceberg 2.0. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Szehon >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:31 PM huaxin gao <huaxin.ga...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> I have a question about iceberg versioning. After the 1.6 release, will >>>> there be versions 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, or will it go straight to 2.0? >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If JDK 8 support is dropped in 2.0, will we continue to fix critical >>>>> issues in 1.6+? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 1:35 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (binding), I did not expect this to be a vote thread, but >>>>>> overall +1 for dropping JDK8 support. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jack >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:30 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1(binding), as much as I want to drop JDK 8, still encourage >>>>>>> everyone to spark out about any concerns. >>>>>>> Yufei >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 10:24 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 6:37 AM Piotr Findeisen < >>>>>>>> piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK >>>>>>>>> 21 support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were >>>>>>>>> initially >>>>>>>>> related. >>>>>>>>> A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, >>>>>>>>> and release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. >>>>>>>>> There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal >>>>>>>>> vote for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best >>>>>>>>> Piotr >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
