Yeah. Too bad. We are still making a good amount of money with our Java API for Flash/Flex. But we have nt added any new features in a while since mot of apps are more in maintenance mode.
I would love to go back and hack of Flex/AIR again but demand has been really low for us lately. On 15 March 2017 at 12:44, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure. But the world turned anti-Flash. If Flash == Adobe, then the world > is anti-Adobe. Not a place a company wants to be… > > > On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:41 PM, Alain Ekambi <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Sure Flash/Flex was nt making lots of money for them. But still. I think > > the are making tons of money somewhere else. And nice ecosystem of devs > is > > always nice for a company. Not sure if that would have hurt thier > current > > business. > > > > This is such a great piece of then. It s really bad to see it slowly go > > away like that. > > > > 10 years later i still have huge problem centering a button in a div > > > > On 15 March 2017 at 12:35, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Adobe does not make much (any?) money from Flash. > >> > >> If they only stand to gain bad press by pushing it, it’s not in their > best > >> interests. > >> > >>> On Mar 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Alain Ekambi <jazzmatad...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Still wondering what s was the logic behind Adobe just Dumping > Flex/Flash > >>> support like that. Still wondering ... > >>> > >>> On 15 March 2017 at 10:55, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since > >> still > >>>> there's no other option in HTML world that give us the same we have > in > >>>> Flex world. It's not only about going HTML, is the productivity you > >> loose > >>>> in that world, and we can't move to another technology that is > clearly a > >>>> step back of what we have today with Flex. > >>>> > >>>> Apache FlexJS is what we are trying to do to get a similar scenario, > and > >>>> hope we could get a great tech ready for the years to come and to have > >> more > >>>> options while preserving the same productivity. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2017-03-15 10:25 GMT+01:00 Vincent <vinc...@after24.net>: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> We are a team of two peoples and we still actively use Flex (desktop > >> and > >>>>> mobile) for our clients needs. > >>>>> > >>>>> Vincent. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Le 15/03/2017 à 08:58, OK a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>>> Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much > better > >>>>>> than > >>>>>> I've expected. > >>>>>> We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps and as long there's at > >>>>>> minimum > >>>>>> one runtime environment available I have no concerns with it... Flex > >> is > >>>> to > >>>>>> powerful to throw it way. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Anyway, I think any kind of software/framework out there has its > >>>>>> dependencies and it's always a good idea to be prepared for some > >> future > >>>>>> scenarios ;-) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Olaf > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development > >>>>>> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/I-am-curious-what-do-you-guys- > >>>>>> think-about-Flash-Player-and-Flash-Platform-s-situation- > >>>>>> today-is-it-be-tp60394p60462.html > >>>>>> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > >>>> Nabble.com. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Carlos Rovira > >>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Alain Ekambi > >>> > >>> Co-Founder > >>> > >>> Ahomé Innovation Technologies > >>> > >>> http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > Alain Ekambi > > > > Co-Founder > > > > Ahomé Innovation Technologies > > > > http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/> > > -- Alain Ekambi Co-Founder Ahomé Innovation Technologies http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/>
