Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since still there's no other option in HTML world that give us the same we have in Flex world. It's not only about going HTML, is the productivity you loose in that world, and we can't move to another technology that is clearly a step back of what we have today with Flex.
Apache FlexJS is what we are trying to do to get a similar scenario, and hope we could get a great tech ready for the years to come and to have more options while preserving the same productivity. 2017-03-15 10:25 GMT+01:00 Vincent <vinc...@after24.net>: > Hi, > > We are a team of two peoples and we still actively use Flex (desktop and > mobile) for our clients needs. > > Vincent. > > > > Le 15/03/2017 à 08:58, OK a écrit : > >> Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much better >> than >> I've expected. >> We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps and as long there's at >> minimum >> one runtime environment available I have no concerns with it... Flex is to >> powerful to throw it way. >> >> Anyway, I think any kind of software/framework out there has its >> dependencies and it's always a good idea to be prepared for some future >> scenarios ;-) >> >> Olaf >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development >> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/I-am-curious-what-do-you-guys- >> think-about-Flash-Player-and-Flash-Platform-s-situation- >> today-is-it-be-tp60394p60462.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
