Still wondering what s was the logic behind Adobe just Dumping Flex/Flash support like that. Still wondering ...
On 15 March 2017 at 10:55, Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> wrote: > Talking about our company (Codeoscopic), we continue with Flex since still > there's no other option in HTML world that give us the same we have in > Flex world. It's not only about going HTML, is the productivity you loose > in that world, and we can't move to another technology that is clearly a > step back of what we have today with Flex. > > Apache FlexJS is what we are trying to do to get a similar scenario, and > hope we could get a great tech ready for the years to come and to have more > options while preserving the same productivity. > > > > 2017-03-15 10:25 GMT+01:00 Vincent <vinc...@after24.net>: > > > Hi, > > > > We are a team of two peoples and we still actively use Flex (desktop and > > mobile) for our clients needs. > > > > Vincent. > > > > > > > > Le 15/03/2017 à 08:58, OK a écrit : > > > >> Same here, the situation could be (always) better but it's much better > >> than > >> I've expected. > >> We're still using AS3/Flex even for new apps and as long there's at > >> minimum > >> one runtime environment available I have no concerns with it... Flex is > to > >> powerful to throw it way. > >> > >> Anyway, I think any kind of software/framework out there has its > >> dependencies and it's always a good idea to be prepared for some future > >> scenarios ;-) > >> > >> Olaf > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development > >> .2333347.n4.nabble.com/I-am-curious-what-do-you-guys- > >> think-about-Flash-Player-and-Flash-Platform-s-situation- > >> today-is-it-be-tp60394p60462.html > >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > http://about.me/carlosrovira > -- Alain Ekambi Co-Founder Ahomé Innovation Technologies http://www.ahome-it.com/ <http://ahome-it.com/>
