I suspect the issue is:
-Classes found in SWCs on the external-library-path are not goog.required.
-Classes found in SWCs on the library-path are goog.required.
It is a bit confusing, I suppose, but I don’t have an easier way to
distinguish right now. A JQuery.swc would go on the external-library path
because its classes are going to be loaded some other way than
goog.require. But for this exercise, if you made a set of externs for
Google Closure Library, you would put it on the library-path so its
classes get goog.require’d but the code in the externs will not get linked
in.
HTH,
-Alex
On 8/21/15, 1:42 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Cool, thanks for the details, I will try to pay attention to those @expose
>
>My first goal now is to migrate and compile Application because I want to
>validate it works generating a simple app based on it, so, I'm in the
>process to migrate and compile all sub elements, I finished with
>HTMLElementWrapper.
>
>Everything compiles but I just notice the goog.require() are not emitted,
>except if you know some of the possible reasons it can occur, I will have
>to debug it, in this case can you speed me up telling me where to break
>and what to check ?
>
>Thanks,
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:06:33 +0000
>>
>> I think I have discovered that Sprite is intended to be more like
>> SimpleApplication and serve as the base class for other applications. I
>> may end up creating some other base class in the org.apache.flex
>>packages
>> instead.
>>
>> On 8/8/15, 10:33 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon
>>repo.
>> >
>> >My bad, thanks.
>> >
>> >> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>> >> remove it if we can.
>> >
>> >Yep, @Erik, any hint ?
>> >
>> >Still remain the start function def, should it be moved to an interface
>> >or removed too ?
>> >
>> >Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> >
>> >----------------------------------------
>> >> From: aha...@adobe.com
>> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Framework using externs (was: Setup Error)
>> >> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:27:53 +0000
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 8/8/15, 8:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>I thought I could have used the framework as a test for what I'm
>>about
>> >>>to
>> >>>implement in the compiler to make IJ compiling externs/as3 based
>> >>>projects
>> >>>with 1 build conf.
>> >>>Apparently I was wrong but I will try to implement it first anyway.
>> >>>
>> >>>For the framework migration, I just had a look and indeed I will
>>have a
>> >>>lot of questions, the 2 first ones:
>> >>>
>> >>>1- If I'm not wrong, sprite.js can't have an AS counterpart, this one
>> >>>needs to stay JS only but it includes a "start" method definition,
>>not
>> >>>having this methos in the AS part, I won't be able to use it, should
>> >>>this
>> >>>definition be moved to an interface in asjs and be shared by both
>>sides
>> >>>?
>> >>
>> >> I don’t remember why we have sprite.js. Maybe Erik does. I’d rather
>> >> remove it if we can.
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>2- Classes and Interfaces are written this way in JS:
>> >>>
>> >>>org.apache.flex.core.IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO ={ names: [{
>> >>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org.apache.flex.core.IStrand' }] };
>> >>>
>> >>>But if I cross compile IStrand.as, I get:
>> >>>
>> >>>org_apache_flex_core_IStrand.prototype.FLEXJS_CLASS_INFO = { names:
>>[{
>> >>>name: 'IStrand', qName: 'org_apache_flex_core_IStrand'}] };
>> >>>
>> >>>Why we still have the underscores ?
>> >>
>> >> We shouldn’t. Make sure you are using the latest from flex-falcon
>>repo.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
